Menu
Press releases

Mechanism of Repression: Can a Person’s Memories be Altered Without Their Knowledge?

Photo by Christophe Hautier on Unsplash

In recent years, the cognitive neurosciences have shown that it is possible to use conscious effort to alter memories. Researchers from the Inserm Center for Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Sainte Anne Hospital and Université Paris Descartes now show that it is possible to unconsciously alter memories. This experimental demonstration of the unconscious manipulation of memories, which is similar to the psychoanalytical concept of repression, has been published in the journal Cognition.

Researchers have known for several years that by making a conscious effort to suppress a specific memory, it is possible to alter it, i.e. reduce our ability to recall it. This effect is expressed by the deactivation of the cerebral hippocampi, brain structures involved in encoding memory. Can the same be done unconsciously?

Led by Professor Raphaël Gaillard, researchers from the Inserm Center for Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Sainte Anne Hospital and Université Paris Descartes put their expertise in consciousness and unconscious processes to good use to test this hypothesis.

In order to recreate in a laboratory setting the conditions of an unconscious recall mechanism, volunteers learned related word pairs (e.g. candle-champagne, walk-hill), and then were trained, when the first word was presented to them, to either think of the second word in the pair or to avoid thinking about it, according to a visual cue. A similar experimental system had in the past made it possible to demonstrate the alteration of a memory by conscious effort.

The originality of this study lies in the fact that these visual cues giving th e instruction to think of or try to avoid thinking of the second word in the pair were sometimes presented subliminally, i.e. too briefly to access the consciousness. When this occurred, the volunteers had to determine as quickly as possible whether the first word was masculine or feminine. While these cues were not perceived at the conscious level, the researchers revealed an alteration in the capacity to recall the second word.

Consequently, the cue associated with the instruction not to think of the second word decreased the ability to recall that word, and the cue associated automatically with the instruction to think of it increased it. This study therefore demonstrates that it is possible to unconsciously manipulate the memory of a word.

This research opens up new perspectives in the understanding of unconscious psychological phenomena. If, within the environment of a laboratory and a two-hour experiment time, it is possible to demonstrate such a phenomenon of repression, in daily life the repetition of elements altering a memory could have major effects.

More generally, this research once again shows that memory is vulnerable to distortion –and even manipulation– thereby representing a challenge for witness accounts and memories of one’s own life.

Medias
Researcher Contact
Raphaël Gaillard MD PhD Chef du Pôle Hospitalo - Universitaire Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne/GHT Paris Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne/GHT Paris Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Adresse électronique : rf.enna-etnias-hc@dralliag.r Tel : +33 (0)1 45 65 86 52
Press Contact
Service de presse de l'Inserm rf.mresni@esserp Service de presse de Saint Anne rf.enna-etnias-hc@ettonetap.f Service de presse de Paris Descartes rf.setracsedsirap@esserp
Sources
Unconscious memory suppression Alexandre Salvadora, b, c, Lucie Berkovitchd, e, Fabien Vinckiera, b, c, e, f , Laurent Cohene, g, h, Lionel Naccachee, g, h, Stanislas Dehaened, i ,Raphaël Gaillarda, b, c, * gro.puselamron@dralliag.leahpar aCentre Hospitalier Sainte[HYPHEN]Anne, Service Hospitalo Universitaire, Paris, France bUniversité Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12 rue de l'école de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France cINSERM, Laboratoire de “Physiopathologie des Maladies Psychiatriques”, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, CPN U894, Institut de Psychiatrie GDR 3557 Paris, France dCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DSV/I2BM, INSERM, Université Paris[HYPHEN]Sud, Université Paris[HYPHEN]Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, 91191 Gif/Yvette, France eUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie[HYPHEN]Paris 6, 4 place Jussieu 75005 Paris, France fMotivation, Brain and Behavior lab, Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Hôpital de la Pitié[HYPHEN]Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris 75013, France. gAssistant Publique Hopitaux de Paris (AP[HYPHEN]HP), Groupe Hospitalier Pitie[HYPHEN]Salpetriere, Department of Neurology, 47 Bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France hInserm, U1127, CNRS, UMR 7225. Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06. Hôpital de la Pitié[HYPHEN]Salpêtrière, 47 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris 75013, France. iCollège de France, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France *Corresponding author at: Centre Hospitalier Sainte[HYPHEN]Anne, Service Hospitalo Universitaire, 1, rue Cabanis, Paris, France. DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.023
fermer