Press releases

Trial on safety and immunogenicity of Ebola vaccines yields promising results

Press release | 14 Dec 2022 - 23h00 | By INSERM PRESS OFFICE
Immunology, inflammation, infectiology and microbiology | Public health

© Inserm/Patrick Delapierre, 2018

 

Ebola epidemics occur periodically in various sub-Saharan African countries. While vaccines exist and have already received WHO Prequalification[1] against the Zaire ebolavirus species, it is essential to pursue and intensify efforts to supplement the available data to develop a safe and effective Ebola vaccine strategies in adults and children alike. The PREVAC international consortium (see box), which includes scientists from Inserm and from institutions in Africa, USA and UK, has published the results of a large-scale randomized clinical trial in West Africa in the New England Journal of Medicine. These results confirm the safety of three different vaccine regimens, and suggest that an immune response is induced and maintained for up to 12 months.

In a context where many sub-Saharan African countries regularly face Ebola outbreaks, vaccines are seen as a central tool to fight the spread of the disease. Since 2019, two vaccines have obtained WHO Prequalification against the Zaire ebolavirus species: the vaccine rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP developed by Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Corp., and the Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen from Johnson & Johnson.

Beyond these advances, research on Ebola vaccines must continue. Indeed, additional data is needed in order to establish the most appropriate recommendations regarding the use of these vaccines, in different categories of the population. 

 

Three Vaccine Regimens Tested

This is the goal of the PREVAC international consortium. Starting in 2017, a vast, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial mobilized African, European and US research teams working together in Liberia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Mali.  It is one of the largest Ebola vaccination trials to date – conducted with both adults and children aged 1 year and older.

The trial aimed to measure the rapidity, intensity and durability of the immune responses generated by three different Ebola vaccine regimens, involving the vaccines mentioned above. It also evaluated the safety and tolerability of the various products administered. 

 

  • The first vaccine regimen tested consisted of injecting one dose of ZEBOV followed 56 days later by one dose of MVA-BN-Filo.
  • The second regimen consisted of injecting one dose of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP.
  • Finally, the third regimen started with one dose of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP followed 56 days later with the same vaccine as a booster.

 

In total, the trial included 1400 adults and 1401 children between 1 and 17 years of age, who were randomized into several groups to test and compare the three regimens versus placebo.

The data obtained suggest that all three regimens are safe and well-tolerated in adults and children.  After vaccination and within the 7 days that followed, the majority of the participants reported pain at the injection site and other minor symptoms (fever, muscle and joint pain, headache, etc.), which generally disappeared after 7 days.

The three regimens also generated a rapid increase, after 14 days, of the amount of antibodies directed against the virus, with a peak at between 1 and 3 months after the first vaccination. While it’s not yet possible to say whether this immune response prevents infection, current scientific literature suggests a strong correlation between the amount of these antibodies and the level of protection against the virus. These antibodies were detected up to 12 months after the first injection.

“The data collected during this clinical trial are valuable because they help confirm the safety and potential efficacy of the available vaccines, making it possible to refine the vaccination recommendations during both Zaire ebolavirus epidemic and inter-epidemic periods, in populations at risk,” explains the trial’s principal investigator, Yazdan Yazdanpanah.

 

“This trial is marked by a high participant retention rate thanks to the unwavering involvement of all the professionals in the field, and the population’s adherence to the research that led to these results,” explains principal investigator Mark Kieh.

 

“The PREVAC trial is a real example of success for international research in emerging and re-emerging infections. We show that with solid collaboration founded on strong partnerships, we can advance Ebola research in the areas of the world most affected by the disease,” emphasizes H Clifford Lane, NIAID Deputy Director for Clinical Research and Special Projects.

 

The work of the PREVAC consortium in West Africa continues, thanks in part to a European funding from the EDCTP supported by the European Union. Participants will be followed up over a 5-year period to assess the long-term safety of vaccines and the durability of the immune response. It is crucial to obtain such data, which will shed light for example on whether or not it is necessary to provide a vaccine booster to individuals who are already vaccinated.

 

Prevac

About PREVAC

Partnership for Research on Ebola Vaccinations (PREVAC) is an international consortium that conducts research in West Africa to assess the safety and efficacy of Ebola vaccination.

The project is co-funded by Inserm, NIAID, LSHTM, and COMAHS and is supported by Guinea, Liberia, Mali, and Sierra Leone. In-field support from the NGO ALIMA has also been crucial to foster the population’s adherence to the research and to monitor the volunteers. The companies Merck and JnJ provided the vaccines used in the trial.

The project received additional funding to continue monitoring volunteers over the long term (PREVAC-UP project) via the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP2) program supported by the European Union.

 

PREVAC UP Partner Organizations:

Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm)*, France; Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale (CNFRSR)*, Guinea; Institut Bouisson Bertrand* (IBB)/ Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Infectiologie (CERFIG) France/ Guinea; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)*, United Kingdom; University of Sierra Leone, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS)*, Sierra Leone; Alliance for International Medical Action (ALIMA)*, France; Inserm-Transfert SA*, France; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), USA; Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (USTTB)*, Mali; Ministry of Health (Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins –Mali)*, Mali; National Public Health Institute of Liberia (NPHIL), Liberia

*EDCTP grant agreement signatories

Inserm’s participation in PREVAC is in part through a subcontract with Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. which operates the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research on behalf of the National Cancer Institute. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government.

The PREVAC UP project is funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP2) program supported by the European Union and the UK Department of Health & Social Care (Grant number RIA2017S – 2014 -PREVAC-UP). Besides the EDCTP2 grant, PREVAC-UP benefits from co-funding from Inserm, the NIAID, the LSHTM and the COMAHS as well as host country support from Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea and Mali.

 

[1] Prequalification means that a vaccine meets WHO standards of quality, safety, and efficacy. Based on this recommendation, United Nations agencies and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, can procure the vaccine for the countries where there is a high level of risk.

TO CITE THIS POST :
Press release – Inserm press room Trial on safety and immunogenicity of Ebola vaccines yields promising results Link : https://presse.inserm.fr/en/trial-on-safety-and-immunogenicity-of-ebola-vaccines-yields-promising-results/46201/
Sources

Vaccines for Ebola virus disease: the PREVAC randomized trial

Mark Kieh *1 M.D., M.S.M.H.C., Laura Richert*2 M.D., Ph.D., Abdoul Habib Beavogui3 M.D., Ph.D., Birgit Grund20 Ph.D., Bailah Leigh5 M.D., M.Sc., Eric D’Ortenzio6,7,8 M.D., Seydou Doumbia9 M.D., Ph.D., Edouard Lhomme2 M.D., Ph.D., Samba Sow10 M.D., Renaud Vatrinet6 Ph.D., Céline Roy11 Ph.D, Stephen B. Kennedy1 M.D., M.Sc., Sylvain Faye12 Ph.D., Shelley Lees13 Ph.D., Niouma Pascal Millimouno14 M.D., Alseny Modet Camara14 M.D, Mohamed Samai5 M.B.B.S., Ph.D., Gibrilla F Deen5 M.D., M.Sc., Moussa Doumbia15 M.D., Hélène Espérou6 M.D., Jerome Pierson16 Ph.D., Deborah Watson-Jones13 M.D., Ph.D, Alpha Diallo6,8 M.D., M.P.H., Deborah Wentworth4 M.P.H., Chelsea McLean17 Ph.D., Jakub Simon18 M.D., Aurélie Wiedemann6, 19 Ph.D., Bonnie Dighero-Kemp16 B.Sc., Lisa Hensley16 Ph.D., M.S.P.H., H. Clifford Lane16 M.D., Yves Levy6,19 M.D., Ph.D., Peter Piot13 M.D., Ph.D., Brian Greenwood13 M.D., Geneviève Chêne11 M.D., Ph.D., James Neaton*4 Ph.D., Yazdan Yazdanpanah*6,7,8 M.D., Ph.D.

*Contributed equally

  1. Partnership for Research on Ebola Virus in Liberia (PREVAIL), Monrovia, Liberia
  2. Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Institut Bergonié, CHU de Bordeaux, CIC-EC 1401, Euclid/F-CRIN clinical trials platform and U1219 BPH, Inria, Sistm, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  3. Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Maferinyah, Guinea
  4. School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  5. College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences (COMAHS), University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
  6. French Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), 75013 Paris, France
  7. AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris F-75018, France

8 ANRS|Emerging Infectious Diseases (France Recherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites|Emerging Infectious Diseases), Paris, France

  1. University Clinical Research Center (UCRC), University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
  2. Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School
  3. Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Institut Bergonié, CHU de Bordeaux, CIC-EC 1401, Euclid/F-CRIN clinical trials platform, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
  4. Département de Sociologie, FLSH, Université Cheikh Anta DIOP, Dakar, Sénégal
  5. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  6. The Alliance for International Medical Action, Alima, B.P.15530 Dakar, Sénégal
  7. Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Ministère de la Santé, Bamako, Mali
  8. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA or under contract/subcontract to NIAID
  9. Janssen Vaccines and Prevention BV Leiden, The Netherlands
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
  11. Vaccine Research Institute, Univ. Paris Est Créteil, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France

20.School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

 

NEJM, décembre 2022

DOI : https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2200072

fermer
fermer
RSS Youtube