Chronic diseases are long-term and sometimes permanent noncommunicable conditions that change over time. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), they are the world’s leading cause of mortality and in Europe “contribute to around 86 % of deaths (…) and represent an increasing burden on healthcare systems, economic development and wellbeing of a large proportion of the population, particularly those aged 50 or above”.
In France, the proportion of those aged 60 or above is expected to increase from one quarter of the total population in 2015 to one third in 2040. Currently, one in four French people has a chronic disease, which increases to three in four beyond the age of 65. With the increase in life expectancy, the number of older adults with chronic diseases is on the up. These are conditions that lead to functional limitations with impacts on quality of life, with the number of dependent individuals expected to rise from 1.2 million in 2012 to 2.3 million in 2060. By improving the prevention and management of chronic diseases, we are therefore taking steps to tackle a major public health emergency.
According to the WHO report of 2010, a large percentage of chronic diseases is responsive to prevention if four primary risk factors are addressed: tobacco use, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption and unhealthy diet. In France, current estimations set the direct (75 %) and indirect (25 %) costs of physical inactivity in the region of €1.3 billion.
Prevention measures can be implemented prior to development of the diseases and at any time during their progression. Given that chronic diseases and their complications contribute very strongly to a state of dependency, preventing their complications and recurrence represents a key challenge for the maintenance of autonomy, notably in older adults.
Inserm was tasked by the French Ministry of Sports with producing a collective expert review in order to take stock of scientific knowledge and to analyze, within the scope of chronic diseases, the impact of physical activity and its place in the care pathway. This review is based on a critical analysis of the international scientific literature made by a multidisciplinary group of thirteen researchers with expertise in various fields relating to chronic diseases, from sports medicine to psychosociology.
The main conditions studied were cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases. Obesity, a determinant of chronic diseases and morbid phenomenon in itself, was also included, as were certain mental disorders (depression, schizophrenia), musculoskeletal disorders and multimorbidity.
The research presented in this review comes with three major challenges.
The first is not so much about knowing whether we should recommend regular adapted physical activity for chronic disease sufferers – there is no longer any doubt on the need for this – but rather determining the most efficient program characteristics according to patient physical aptitudes and psychosocial resources, in order to obtain maximum benefit with minimum risk: when should the program begin, what kind of physical activity should it include, at what intensity, how often, in what environment and with what kind of intervention?
The second involves identifying what determines the adoption of behavior that is active, maintained over the long-term and compatible with patient lifestyles. After all, what would be the point of a physical activity program whose efficacy was demonstrated by a clinical trial conducted under ideal conditions, but which turns out to be unsuitable for and ignored by patients?
The third challenge is about understanding the mechanisms through which physical activity acts in general, by improving the physical condition, and also specifically according to the diseases concerned. A large part of the review describes for each disease the benefits/risks of physical activity, and its utility in terms of prevention, treatment and additional care.
The expert group uses these scientific elements as a basis on which to establish recommendations for research as well as recommendations for health authorities in terms of measures to take.
While rest has long been the rule in many chronic diseases, we are now seeing a genuine paradigm change with scientific studies showing that, when physical activity recommendations and disease-related complications are taken into account, not only does exercise not worsen the condition but that it is also more beneficial the sooner after diagnosis it is introduced.
Consequently, the expert group considers that physical activity forms an integral part of the treatment of chronic diseases. It recommends its systematic prescription, as early as possible in the care pathways of the diseases studied. It also recommends its prescription prior to any drug treatment in mild to moderate depression, type 2 diabetes, obesity and lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
The expert group has also prepared the following recommendations which, although specific to each disease, do agree on the frequency of adapted physical activity – namely a minimum of three sessions per week.
Here are some examples:
The principal barriers to physical activity are generally related to the disease itself (pain, fatigue, side effects of certain treatments…).
The main challenge therefore is to adapt the physical activity to the patient’s health, treatment, physical capacity, medical risks and psychosocial resources.
The expert group recommends:
A physical activity project must take the entire patient pathway into account. From the very beginning of treatment, it is important to devise the preparation and identification of the elements enabling the patient to pursue physical activity in or close to their home. It is about enabling the patient to immediately mobilize their capacities and if they wish, to play an active role in their care pathway.
The main challenge is for the patient to make physical activity part of their daily life, which from the outset involves encouraging their commitment to and the development of their autonomy in an activity that is meaningful for the patient and which they can pursue over the long-term. The correct incorporation of physical activity in the overall treatment and therapeutic education project means regular communication between the adapted physical activity professional and the healthcare team.
The expert group recommends combining the programs of physical activity with programs of therapeutic education and initiating any intervention with a shared educational assessment which invites the patient to identify their life habits, needs, possibilities, desires, obstacles and incentives, and how they would like to be helped… Then an objective should be set and the resources that they will mobilize to achieve that objective identified. Follow-up assessments will make it possible to adjust the objectives and renew the resources throughout the program.
For patients presenting characteristics known to limit or compromise adherence and long-term maintenance of the activity (older age, low socioeconomic level, social precariousness…) and/or with little or no experience of physical activity, the expert group recommends a professionally-supervised educational cycle of adapted physical activity of several months’ duration. The challenge being to enable these patients to experience physical activities appropriate to their possibilities and needs, to feel and get pleasure from the effects and recognize them as being beneficial to their health.
Once the patient has the resources, the expert group then recommends supporting them in building a physical activity project which has meaning for their care pathway and life.
Suggesting forms of physical activity that are not just effective but also fun and motivating needs to remain an ongoing concern. The commitment of individuals with chronic diseases to regular physical activity is primarily motivated by the pleasure and utility they find in it and also by their beliefs in terms of perceived benefit for their physical health and psychological wellbeing. Inversely, a lack of knowledge of the positive effects of physical activity or negative beliefs according to which it would be useless in managing their condition, may underlie any failure to initiate or maintain this activity.
Patients can also be motivated by the positive self-image generated by physical activity (or the negative view they would have of themselves in its absence). More particularly, having to take oneself in hand in order to face the disease in question is seen by some as a responsibility or a duty.
While intentions and planning are generally an unavoidable stage in establishing physical activity, routines need to be created for it to be adopted over the long-term. To encourage the long-term maintenance of motivation, the expert group recommends using a combination of strategies, which include communicating information on the effects of physical activity and the opportunities for engaging in it, the definition of objectives, the follow-up and anticipation of barriers and obstacles to its pursuit, the social support and sharing of experiences, cognitive reassessment and motivational interviewing.
These strategies have a greater effect on motivation when several of them are used together. They can be used by various stakeholders throughout the care pathway (nursing staff, doctors, psychologists, adapted physical activity specialists…) during individual or group face-to-face sessions. Some strategies may benefit from technological support (accelerometer, social media, websites, telephone calls, text messages, connected health objects, serious games, videoconferences…).
Training in the theoretical and practical knowledge of the benefits of physical activity and of the physical activity intervention initiatives is required for all healthcare professionals.
As a consequence, the expert group recommends:
The expert group recommends training adapted physical activity specialists in how to:
Few studies evaluate the conditions of maintaining physical activity over the long-term, in a “real-world” environment. Yet a patient with a chronic disease has to face potential side effects or sequelae of the treatments and manage the progression of their disease as they get older. This can take the form of the development of other diseases (comorbidities), anxiety or depression symptoms or neurocognitive dysfunction. Getting patients with chronic diseases to adopt new behaviors requires the precise definition of what is at stake in the psychological adjustment to this type of disease.
The expert group recommends consolidating research concerning the feasibility, benefit-risk balance, adherence over the long term to physical activity and in particular it recommends studying the conditions necessary to maintain it, especially during the transition phases (from the hospital to the follow-up and rehabilitation care center, from the center to community medicine, from community medicine to home) and to study the intervention initiatives.
It is about pinpointing the meaning that physical activity can have for the patient during their disease, analyzing the impact on its conduct by interactions with healthcare professionals, peers, family members, and by identifying the conditions enabling the patient to establish new parameters for living.
The expert group recommends evaluating the technological tools and testing their efficacy in order to estimate the benefit of their incorporation in the patient pathways.
The innovations and prevention interventions which do not take social health inequalities into account often help make them worse. Consequently, the expert group recommends conducting studies to analyze the cost-effectiveness of these new technologies according to patient culture, age, sociocultural level and expectations.
The French national “Sport, health and well-being” plan has produced new partnerships in the 22 regional territories, helping to develop a physical activity offering with the purpose of preventing chronic diseases. By developing the prescription by treating physicians of adapted physical activity for patients with chronic diseases, article 144 of the French public health law and the tools accompanying it, are targeting the widespread implementation of this type of prescription. This raises the question of the accessibility to this treatment or prevention provision for all sufferers of chronic diseases, irrespective of their age, geographical area of residence or their socioeconomic and cultural resources.
The expert group recommends studying the construction of the medical prescription of physical activity and its impact on social inequalities in health, examining also how covering its cost would affect patient take-up of the programs and their commitment over the long-term.
 Inserm Collective Expert Review. Social inequalities in health linked to diet and physical activity, 2014
 WHO defines physical activity as “any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure”.
Since its creation in 1993, Inserm’s Collective Expert Review has been entrusted with a mission of expert review and knowledge transfer for many institutional bodies and decision-makers (Ministries, Agencies, etc.) in the area of public health.
This mission, performed by the Collective Expert Review Unit attached to the Thematic Institute for Public Health, provides scientific insight to assist decision-making in matters of public policy on health. The Collective Expert Review Unit ensures the scientific framework, bibliographic support, coordination and promotion of collective expert reviews.
Having accumulated widely-renowned experience and know-how, Inserm’s Collective Expert Review currently occupies a unique position in the field of health-related expert review. The expert review procedure relies on the scientific competences of expert researchers and clinicians representing all disciplines useful to public health, gathered into ad hoc working groups by the Collective Expert Review Unit. In a constant drive for scientific excellence, independence and relevance in relation to scientific, economic and social issues raised by the themes addressed, the reviews contribute to the social application of the sciences. Experts are chosen within the French-speaking scientific community for their scientific competences (as evidenced by their publications) and for their independence.
Collective expert reviews, published in book form, address important issues such as health and environment, occupational health, aging, nutrition, addictive behaviors, disabilities, etc. Many of these reports provide a summary and recommendations, available online as soon as the results of the expert review are published. The complete book is available in bookshops and online in the months following publication.
The expert review “Physical activity. Prevention and treatment of chronic diseases”, has taken over 3 years of work and the critical analysis of approximately 1,800 scientific documents.
Les essais nucléaires atmosphériques réalisés par la France en Polynésie française entre 1966 et 1974 ont entraîné des retombées radioactives dont les conséquences sanitaires sont encore mal connues. À la demande du ministère de la Défense, l’Inserm a réalisé une expertise collective ...
Une nouvelle étude révèle que l'exposition à des produits chimiques qui dérèglent le système endocrinien (les perturbateurs endocriniens ou PE) pourrait interférer avec différents signaux biologiques du corps humain jouant un rôle important dans la sévérité de la Covid-19. ...
Expert group who prepared this expert review:
Julie BOICHE, Epsylon Laboratory EA 4556, Université Montpellier 1
François CARRE, Signal and Image Processing Laboratory (LTSI) JRU Inserm 1099, Université de Rennes 1
Béatrice FERVERS, Cancer and Environment Department, Centre Léon Bérard
Damien FREYSSENET, Laboratory of Exercise Physiology – EA4338, Faculty of Medicine, Campus Santé Innovation
Isabelle GREMY, Ile-de-France Regional Health Observatory
Thibaut GUIRAUD, Institute of Metabolic Diseases, CV I2MC, Inserm JRU1048 Toulouse, Clinique Cardiocéan
Cédric MORO, Inserm JRU1048 Institute of Metabolic Diseases, CV (I2MC), University Hospital Rangueil
Christelle NGUYEN, and Serge POIRAUDEAU†, Cochin Hospital, Department for the Re-education and Rehabilitation of the Musculoskeletal System and Spinal Diseases, INSERM JRU-S 1124 – Toxicology, Pharmacology and Cell Signaling, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité
Grégory NINOT, Université de Montpellier, Epsylon EA4556, Collaborative University Platform for Evaluating Health Prevention and Supportive Care Programs (CEPS)
Claire PERRIN, Sciences and Techniques of Physical and Sporting Activities (Staps) Training and Research Unit, CRIS-EA647/AP and Vulnerability, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Alain VARRAY, Movement to Health (M2H) Laboratory, Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation, Université de Montpellier, EuroMov
Agnès VINET, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Pharm-Ecology (LAPEC) EA 4278, Université d’Avignon, University Sports and Research Center
Guillaume WALTHER, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Pharm-Ecology (LAPEC) EA 4278, Université d’Avignon, University Sports and Research Center
This expert review was coordinated by Inserm’s Collective Expert Review Unit attached to the Thematic Institute for Public Health.
This expert review is published under the title “Physical activity. Prevention and treatment of chronic diseases”
Éditions EDP Sciences, January 2019, 824 pages, € 70 Collection Expertise Collective
Link to the summary available online at www.inserm.fr